Consider the number 2058. It is a reversible factor if the number formed by writing it in reverse (8502) is a multiple. Likewise, a number is a reversible multiple if the number formed by writing it in reverse is a factor. Of course, 2058 is not reversible because 8502/2058 = 4.131, which is not a whole number. The question immediately arises: Are there reversible factors? If so, what is the smallest reversible factor?

Let's begin with a few preliminary considerations. First no single digit numbers can be reversible, for a single digit written in reverse is the same number. So the smallest reversible number must have at least two digits. Second, the factor by which you multiply a reversible factor to get a reversible multiple must be a single digit between 2 and 9. Zero, of course is out of the question. No number but 0 can have 0 for a factor. Likewise, 1 is completely uninteresting since it is a factor of every number. So the number 11, which might otherwise be considered the smallest reversible factor (11 = 11 × 1) is excluded. Of course, any number greater than 9 will yield a multiple with more digits than the factor. For example, 11 × 10 = 110 might work if we were to allow leading zeros (e. g., 011), but in fact 11 is a two-digit number while 110 is a three-digit number. A related consequence is that no reversible number may begin or end with 0. Now let's take a look at the factors 2-9 in turn and see if any will yield reversible numbers.

A reversible number multiplied by 2 must begin with a 1, 2, 3, or 4. Any higher digit will cause the resulting number to have an extra digit. Likewise, it must end in 2, 4, 6, or 8. So we have the following possibilities: 1...2, 2...4, 3...6, and 4...8. Multiplying each of these by 2 gives: 2...4 (not 2...1), 4...8 (not 4...2), 6...2 (not 6...3), and 8...6 (not 8...4). Clearly, we cannot get a reversible number using 2 as a factor.

A reversible number multiplied by 3 must begin with 1, 2, or 3. Four and greater will result in too many digits. Likewise it must end in 3, 6, or 9. So we have the following possibilities: 1...3, 2...6, and 3...9. Multiplying each by 3 gives: 3...9 (not 3...1), 6...8 (not 6...2), and 9...7 (not 9...3). Again, no reversible numbers with 3 as a multiplier.

A reversible number multiplied by 4 must begin with 1 or 2. 3 and greater will cause too-many digits. Likewise it must end in 4 or 8, thus: 1...4, and 2...8. Multiplying each by 4 gives: 4...6 (not 4...1) and 8...2, which happens to work fine! So our first candidate is 2...8. Let's move on.

A reversible number multiplied by 5 or greater must begin with 1 and end with the multiplier. This yields the following: 1...5 × 5 = 5...5 (no good), 1...6 × 6 = 6...6 (no good), 1...7 × 7 = 7...9 (no good), 1...8 × 8 = 8...4 (no good), and 1...9 × 9 = 9...1, which is promising.

We now have two candidates: 2…8 × 4 = 8…2 and 1…9 × 9 = 9…1. No two-digit
solutions are possible since 28 × 4 ≠ 82 and 19 × 9 ≠ 91. Consider
the three-digit possibilities: 2*a*8 ×
4 = 8*a*2 and 1*a*9 × 9 = 9*a*1. Since no
carry is allowed when multiplying the second digit, we get 4*a* + 3 = *a*
and 9*a* + 8 = *a*. Both equations yield *a* = -1,
which is clearly impossible. So
there are no three-digit solutions.

How about 4-digits? Our candidates are 2*ab*8
× 4 = 8*ba*2 and 1*ab*9 × 9 = 9*ba*1. So 4 × *b *+ 3 ends in *a*, and the carry when added to 4 × *a* = *b* with no carry. Therefore, *a* < 3.
Furthermore, *a* must be odd because 4 ×
*b* + 3 ends in *a*, and you can’t add 3 to an even number and get another even
number. Therefore *a* = 1 is the only
possibility. If 4 × *b* + 3 ends in 1, then 4 × *b*
ends in 8. The only multiples of 4 that end in 8 are 8 and 28, so *b* must be 2 or 7. Of these 7 is the only
one that works. 2178 × 4 = 8712. Similar reasoning yields 1089 × 9 = 9801.

Therefore, the smallest reversible factor is 1089. The only other 4-digit reversible
factor is 2178, which happens to be 2 × 1089. Not only that,
all four numbers are multiples of the smallest palindromic
number 11—twice. (1089 = 11^{2} × 3^{2} and the other numbers
are all multiples of 1089).